 Rank: Super Fly
Joined: 7/24/2011(UTC)
Posts: 3,354
Location: Sussex Wisconsin
Thanks: 103 times
Was thanked: 128 time(s) in 106 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: madguy30 
I'd actually put bluegill ahead of largemouth in size vs. fight.
I'll second that. Bluegills on light tackle are a blast. Every now and then you think you've hooked into a large bass, only to reel in a 6" Gill. -Bill |
“You'll never look back on your life and wish you had spent more time in the office." -- Brian Trautman, Captain SV Delos |
|
|
|
|
|
 Rank: Midge
Joined: 3/30/2018(UTC) Posts: 35  Location: Harvard, IL Thanks: 3 times
Was thanked: 3 time(s) in 2 post(s)
|
Originally Posted by: William Schlafer Originally Posted by: madguy30
I'd actually put bluegill ahead of largemouth in size vs. fight.
I'll second that. Bluegills on light tackle are a blast. Every now and then you think you've hooked into a large bass, only to reel in a 6" Gill. -Bill I have a pond that I've been killing time fly fishing for bluegills on lately, pound for pound those little guys put up quite the fight. All in all, I agree with most everyone on rankings of fish, at least for those that I have knowledge of catching. To the OP, that's quite a hefty bass, nice catch. My son recently sent me a pic of a similar sized SMB that he caught while trout fishing where he lives in MI. This particular creek he fishes has quite a population of creek chubs and some marginal frog water, but is known locally to produce some big brownies as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
